OECD - The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues (2)


Article "The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues" in (OECD)’s website
PDF file

The second part of the report is on policy issues.
Some highlights:

Crisis Management
Three basic and separable steps to deal with a banking system solvency crisis:
1. Guarantee liabilities to stop bank runs.

2. Separate the good assets from the bad assets, and get the bad assets off bank balance sheets

method 1: ‘asset management’ approach to buying toxic assets
e.g TARP in its initial form; actions during Asia Crisis

method 2: nationalise banks, separate the bad assets, and then sell the cleaned-up banks back to the private sector.
e.g approach used in Scandinavia in 1991; Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) in US’s Savings and Loans (S&L) Crisis

Method 3: Encourage a large better capitalised bank to take over a smaller failing bank and absorb its losses

3. Recapitalise the asset-cleansed banks by finding new equity holders, via selling common shares or preference shares to private entities or government

Exit Strategy and Long Term Reform
3 areas:
1. Reform in incentive systems
2. Matching cost of capital to the risks that institutions actually take, by regulatory influence
3. Exit government bank ownership and insurance commitments through asset sales and debt management techniques.

Its "Figure 4. Incentive structure, influences and outcomes" shows main channels of influence. It is an insightful summary.

Some concepts that I think worthwhile to learn about and explore further:
Theory of the second best :
if market failures are present then reforms to improve pieces of the system (as opposed to reforming the global interactions between regulatory, tax, remuneration and other governance factors, etc.) may not help and indeed may make things worse.

Basel I and Basel II : to match capital regulation with the riskiness of bank lending
Capital rules : pro-cyclical
end result: not able to avert financial crisis.

OECD - The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues (2)


Article "The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues" in (OECD)’s website
PDF file

The second part of the report is on policy issues.
Some highlights:

Crisis Management
Three basic and separable steps to deal with a banking system solvency crisis:
1. Guarantee liabilities to stop bank runs.

2. Separate the good assets from the bad assets, and get the bad assets off bank balance sheets

method 1: ‘asset management’ approach to buying toxic assets
e.g TARP in its initial form; actions during Asia Crisis

method 2: nationalise banks, separate the bad assets, and then sell the cleaned-up banks back to the private sector.
e.g approach used in Scandinavia in 1991; Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) in US’s Savings and Loans (S&L) Crisis

Method 3: Encourage a large better capitalised bank to take over a smaller failing bank and absorb its losses

3. Recapitalise the asset-cleansed banks by finding new equity holders, via selling common shares or preference shares to private entities or government

Exit Strategy and Long Term Reform
3 areas:
1. Reform in incentive systems
2. Matching cost of capital to the risks that institutions actually take, by regulatory influence
3. Exit government bank ownership and insurance commitments through asset sales and debt management techniques.

Its "Figure 4. Incentive structure, influences and outcomes" shows main channels of influence. It is an insightful summary.

Some concepts that I think worthwhile to learn about and explore further:
Theory of the second best :
if market failures are present then reforms to improve pieces of the system (as opposed to reforming the global interactions between regulatory, tax, remuneration and other governance factors, etc.) may not help and indeed may make things worse.

Basel I and Basel II : to match capital regulation with the riskiness of bank lending
Capital rules : pro-cyclical
end result: not able to avert financial crisis.

Real Estate Malaysia - The Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Malaysia

Found this website of The Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Malaysia :
website

Quite a useful website to know more about Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents.

The Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Malaysia, under Ministry of Finance, Malaysia, is regulating the Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents practising in Malaysia.

Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents in Malaysia are governed under Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Act 1981.

Some highlights from the website:
1. Qualifications
We can know what are the academic qualifications, professional qualifications and test of professional competence for registration as a Valuer or an Estate Agent.
Maybe we can search further to find out the body of knowledge to be a Valuer or an Estate Agent.

2. Fees
We can find out how much are the fees for valuation services, property management and estate agency, at least we can know whether we are overcharged.

3. Code of conduct
Great. Can find what are not allowed on Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents.

4. Search
Good to confirm whether your Valuer, Appraiser and Estate Agent hired are a legally registered one.

5. Role/Role of Negotiator
We can learn what are the roles of Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Management and Negotiator.
It also shows current number of firms, registered members & probationary members.

6. Publications
A number of publications listed, with their price.
Most are not expensive. Of interest is "Malaysian Valuation Standards" (RM15).
Will this teach us "how to evaluate real estate in M’sia" ?

Note:
Do check out my other posts on
Malaysia investment and real estate.

OECD - The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues (1)


Found an article "The Current Financial Crisis – Causes and Policy Issues" in (OECD)’s website.

Some highlights from the article on causes of the current financial crisis:

Current financial crisis as being caused at two levels:
1. by global macro liquidity policies
2. by a very poor regulatory framework

Global macro liquidity policies that causes global liquidity distortion,s,
including interest rates at 1 per cent in the United States and 0 per cent
in Japan, China's fixed exchange rate, the Sovereign Wealth Funds.

The poor regulatory framework, far from acting as a second line of defence, actually contributed to the crisis in important ways.

Area: mortgage securitisation and off-balance sheet activity

Year of causality: 2004
Things happening in 2004:
1. The Bush Administration ‘American Dream’ zero equity mortgage proposals

2. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) imposed greater capital
requirements and balance sheet controls on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,

3. The Basel II accord on international bank regulation was published and opened an arbitrage opportunity for banks that caused them to accelerate off-balance-sheet activity

4. SEC agreed to allow investment banks (IB’s) voluntarily to benefit from regulation changes to manage their risk using capital calculations under the ‘consolidated supervised entities program’; from 15:1 debt to net equity ratio to allowing them to increase their leverage ratio towards 40:1 in some cases.

On Investment Banks:

  • Banks created their own Fannie and Freddie lookalikes: SIVs and CDOs.
  • They move their business model towards equity culture (focus on share price growth, earnings expansion, becoming "growth stocks") and based on securitisation. Compensation evolves to bonuses based on up-front revenue generation, options, employee share participation schemes.

On Basel II:

  • Basel II makes mortgages more attractive (capital weight given to mortgages fell from 50 per cent to 35 per cent, makes greater concentration in low-capital-weighted mortgages improves the overall bank return ).
  • Portfolio invariance (riskiness of an asset like a mortgage is independent of how much of the asset you add to your portfolio) becomes an arbitrage opportunity. To illustrate its points, some case studies are used: Citi, Northern Rock and UBS.

A great read on what happens on these companies.
There is also a corporate governance comparison.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Disclaimer

Disclaimer:
The opinion post on this blog is personal and is not an inducement to buy or sell any investment products. The author of this blog will NOT be held responsible for any losses incurred due to the reliance on any content of this blog for investment decisions.